What our automated checks cover

Automated results only. Automated tests find some, not all, accessibility issues, and manual testing is still needed. Not legal advice or a compliance certification.

Glimscope uses the open-source axe-core engine (by Deque Systems; Glimscope is not affiliated with Deque), version 4.14.0. This page was generated on from that version's rule data. On each page scanned, every scan runs the axe rules tagged wcag2a, wcag2aa, wcag21a, wcag21aa, wcag22aa, best-practice, except rules axe marks experimental or deprecated. That is 91 of the 105 rules in this axe-core version.

Of the 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA success criteria, 21 are partly checked by at least one automated rule below and 34 are not checked by any rule we run. A rule only checks part of a criterion: passing every automated rule does not mean a criterion is met, and every criterion still needs manual review.

Fix guides for common findings

When a scan flags one of these, these guides walk through how to fix it in common CMS tools. They do not cover every way a criterion can fail. Automated tests find only some accessibility issues; manual testing is still required. Not legal advice.

More step-by-step guides: /guides.

Criteria with no automated rule in our scans (34)

None of the rules we run is tagged to these criteria, so our scans report nothing about them. They need manual review by a person.

Criteria partly checked by automated rules (21)

A rule here checks only some ways a page can fail the criterion. A scan with no issues for these rules does not mean the criterion is met.

1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A; 7 rules; manual review still needed)

1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

1.3.1 Info and Relationships (Level A; 9 rules; manual review still needed)

1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose (Level AA; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

1.4.1 Use of Color (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

1.4.2 Audio Control (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (Level AA; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

1.4.4 Resize Text (Level AA; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

1.4.12 Text Spacing (Level AA; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

2.1.1 Keyboard (Level A; 3 rules; manual review still needed)

2.2.1 Timing Adjustable (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide (Level A; 2 rules; manual review still needed)

2.4.1 Bypass Blocks (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

2.4.2 Page Titled (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) (Level A; 2 rules; manual review still needed)

2.5.3 Label in Name (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) (Level AA; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

3.1.1 Language of Page (Level A; 3 rules; manual review still needed)

3.1.2 Language of Parts (Level AA; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (Level A; 1 rule; manual review still needed)

4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (Level A; 28 rules; manual review still needed)

Other criteria (including AAA) tagged on rules we run (1)

These rules run because of another tag in our set; the criteria below are outside WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA (for example Level AAA).

2.1.3

Best-practice rules (27)

These rules are not tied to a WCAG success criterion. They flag common problems that make pages harder to use. They are not WCAG requirements, and passing them is not needed for WCAG conformance.

WCAG criteria list: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/ (W3C Recommendation, 12 December 2024; checked 14 Oct 2026). WCAG is published by W3C; Glimscope is not endorsed by W3C. axe-core is © Deque Systems, MPL-2.0.